Writing

The Federalist report

Constitution. The authors amplify their arguments and convince their readers by offering several vital historical references and literary allusions which are presented in a persuasive manner. In an analysis of the authors’ premise for writing the book, it becomes evident that The Federalist was conceived as a series of newspaper essays to defend the work of the Constitutional Convention. It was Alexander Hamilton who identified the significance of the work in order to advocate the ratification of the proposed U.S. Constitution and he recruited James Madison and John Jay as coauthors to the collection of crucial essays on the relevance of a New Constitution for the United States of America. To all these three men, any useful strategy to set up an effective central government requires New York’s ratification of the Constitution. …
at union – the necessity of a government at least equally energetic with the one proposed to the attainment of this object – The conformity of the proposed constitution to the true principles of republican government…” (Hamilton et al, 4) The series of papers in the collection also aims at indicating the need for additional security for the preservation of the liberty and property of the people of the nation. Following the general introduction to the book by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay makes a profound discussion of the dangers from foreign force and influence, which extends to four chapters of the book. In this discussion, the author deals, in detail, with the various types of dangers that the nation faces from foreign forces. In the next section, Hamilton talks about dangers from disagreements between the states and he enumerates upon the particular causes of such dissensions. Along with this, the author also makes a reflection upon the consequences of hostilities between the states. As a remedy to this essential issue, the author underlines the utility of the union as a safeguard against domestic faction and insurrection. James Madison also makes his reflections on the usefulness of the union as a protection against domestic faction and insurrection. Similarly, the authors emphasize, in the following section, the utility of the union in respect to commercial relations and a navy. They also deal with the advantages of the union in respect to revenue and economy in government. In the subsequent sections of the book, the authors bring out the insufficiency of the present confederation to preserve the union and the related defects of the present confederation. They also use this section to answer the objections to the proposed constitution from extent of

Back To Top