More of concern is whether the show can bring correct and reliable information to the public. The essay argues that these programs do not provide information that is worth to be trusted by the public (Zinser 363).The actual problem is the assessment of the overall outcomes of information from comedy programs like The Daily shows. It is important to care where people get information because people need to be properly informed. More so, the dissemination of information is extremely significant in a democratic society. However, to justify this point, there are damaging effects media controlled by the state might have for instance in North Korea, Iran, and Iraq under Hussein’s regime. However, a more informed public is the grease that keeps on democracy to run properly (Zinser 363).The most two disturbing challenges coming from the comedy shows or programs are the deception and dilution. For example, The Daily Show uses events that are real as a vehicle for the comedy. More so, The Daily Show is billing itself as a series that is unburdened by journalistic integrity, objectivity, or accuracy. Therefore, it is unrealistic for the show that is unburdened by objectivity to provide a piece of well-informed and reliable information to the large swaths of America about national and foreign news events. However, this can be described as the challenge of deception that cloaks a real news program as an entertainment. Another concern is the problem of dilution. The Daily Show, now, enjoys success because it attracts more than 1.4 million for their daily dose. However, these programs might prompt traditional journalistic venues, for instance as the nightly news programs on key broadcast networks, to infuse the hard news with entertainment and this might dilute the reliable news media at large (Zinser 365).Also, The Daily Show is shaping the perspective of people in the world.