We propose a framework based on the concept of market equilibrium research programs that make up literature on public opinion and foreign policy. To do this, in addition to considering the relationship between leaders and public, we include third strategic player, media, which we believe plays the important role, as well as citizens and elites in shaping attitudes to, and its influence on foreign policy (Brody 32-88). Our goal is to clarify the multifaceted relationship between these entities and the results of foreign policy.Media is the most likely source of change over time in foreign policy preferences of individuals. On one hand, media is the main route between the public and politicians. Policymakers should media on public opinion and media are the main source of information for the public on what politicians do. In addition, media are main most people get their information on foreign affairs, for whom issue of personal experience is unlikely to provide useful information. If foreign politicians respond to public and respond to media, study of nature and extent of influence of media on public opinion crucial. Cook (154-950) note: it would premature to celebrate the triumph of democracy, but not knowing how and by whom public itself influence similar problems in a mind-limited number of studies. Some authors have examined impact of media on individuals preferences for policy Gulf War example, (Gunther 279-87). The little report examines the relationship between the content of media, public opinion and foreign policy for the extended period, however.Current work represents the effort to study relationship, using the next section design. The two-phase study examines the relationship between the importance of foreign affairs to the media of Foreign Affairs to the public. This analysis of scheduling based on time series data and the United States and the United Kingdom, providing more comparative and generalizing results to us by the research centre. Moreover, the analysis focuses on the importance of the value of the issue, problem as measured larger (MIP) question of the study of foreign policy (Shapiro and Lawrence 223-45).