Matthey L Felli R and Mager C we do have space in lausanne We have a large cemetery the noncontroversy of a nonexistent

51250 In fact, Ziegler mentioned how these funerary practices are a function of a political project in governance. This introduction framed the forthcoming discussion as essentially an academic and philosophical exercise, in the sense the topic of funerary practices is talked about in unusually deep intellectual discussion of the sensitive topics of death, immigration, politics, integration, power, governance, and other highly-conceptual topics. In other words, the reader was well-advised to prepare himself for a profound discussion of the said topics and that much material of academic origins will be used to support and augment the discussions and arguments. The article authors had read a lot of background academic material on their topic and used them extensively all throughout their article, by making frequent and liberal citations in the article. The article had seemed like a literature review of sorts by the sheer number of the journal articles, writings, and books used in the discussions. At any rate, it is hard to argue for or against some of the justifications they had used in their article, because the discussions are also very abstract in nature although the reader is free to form his or her own conclusions. Discussion (Argument) Their argument centered on how the perception of death had changed so much in the eyes of Western society. Death had once been seen as a great equalizer, a natural consequence of life, but the new social sciences had denaturalized death. it is now viewed as the social and political product of social relationships. that death is essentially a social construction whereas the prevailing mindset was that death is largely a cultural thing or a result of civilization. This new paradigm overturns the previous philosophy of death due to the emerging importance of funerary practices, especially within an urban setting in a modern society, with politics in it. A desired effect of this article is to bring the discussion of death into a new direction. The article authors gave the three main approaches with regards to funerary practices in terms of the location of cemeteries within the larger discussion of the geography of religion in which the first is the physical arrangement of a cemetery (its layout, design, or architecture) or called as the classical approach, the second is the cultural geography, in which a cemetery is indicative of social representations of the phenomenon of death, a function of the culture of a given society affecting the relationships between the living and the dead, and lastly, the third approach which is a conception of the idea of “deathscapes” that involve appropriate land-use and the allocation of burial spaces, which in turn cause certain conflicts among stakeholders. Structure The academic and intellectual premise of the article was framed in the form or kind of a question: how does the regulation of a space (in this case, a cemetery) dedicated to a certain type of funeral practices related to the “governmentality” of the political community of citizens? (Matthey, Felli, &amp. Mager, 2013, p. 430). Along this line, funerary practices such as the allocation of precious urban space is located within the larger context of the politics in that particular community, in which

Back To Top